STANDARDS

 

Home
ALBUM
FOR SALE
HINTS AND TIPS
HISTORY
JUDGING
LINKS
PUPPIES
STUD DOGS
STANDARDS
GEMS
WOW PAGE

 

One might think that the information on this page should be on the history page but we believe it should be on  the "standards" page for the passionate student bulldogger to comprehend how the standard shapes the breed, a fact well understood by KC managers but not by the rank and file bulldoggers and true lovers of the breed worldwide ,who just want todays' bulldog to remain as he is today. (June 2009)

In our opinion any breeder, judge or just a lover of the breed must read up on the history of this exclusive breed  and especially read , digest and thoroughly understand the first, very thorough and comprehensive ,dog standard which was compiled by men who truly were matching form to function and were extremely careful in their choice of words while understanding that dogs do not come off a perfect production line and thus words like "could" "should" or "must" demonstrably conveys the thoroughness of their use of the English language by the authors of the time in describing this most quintessential British breed which appears to be in danger of being changed beyond recognition by the very organisation formed to encourage and promote the breeding of Pedigree dogs of the true type .

 

The Bulldog Club Inc. Original Bulldog Standard

copied from the 1903 rule book of the Birmingham and Midland Counties Bulldog Club.

STANDARD DESCRIPTION OF THE CORRECT APPEARANCE AND THE SEVERAL POINTS IN DETAIL OF THE PERFECT BULLDOG

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The following description of the Pure-bred Bulldog has been compiled and adopted by "The BULLDOG CLUB (Incorporated) as the correct standard type of excellence in the breed after carefully comparing all obtainable opinions                                            

  -In forming a judgement on any specimen of the breed ,the general appearance ,which is the first impression a dog makes as a whole on the eye of the Judge, should first be considered.                                                                                                                                         

Secondly, should be noticed it’s size, shape and make, or rather it’s proportions in the relation they bear to each other. (No point should be so much in excess of others as to destroy the general symmetry or make the dog appear deformed, or interfere with it’s powers of motion etc.)                                                                                                                                    

Thirdly, his style, carriage, gait, temper and his several points should be considered separately in detail, as follows, due allowance being made for the bitch, which is not so grand or as well developed as the dog.                                                                                              

(1)The general appearance of the Bulldog is that of a smooth-coated, thick-set dog, rather low in stature but broad, powerful and compact. It's head strikingly massive and large in proportion to the dog’s size. It's face extremely short. It's muzzle very broad, blunt and inclined upwards . It's body short and well knit, the limbs stout and muscular. It's hindquarters high and strong but rather lightly made in comparison with it’s heavily made fore parts. The dog should convey an impression of determination , strength and activity, similar to that suggested by the appearance of a thick-set Ayrshire Bull                                                                                                      

(2)The skull should be very large-the larger the better- and in circumference should measure (round in front of the ears ) at least the height of the dog at the shoulders. Viewed from the front it should appear very high from the corner of the lower jaw to the apex of the skull and also very broad and square. The cheeks should be well rounded and extended sideways beyond the eyes. Viewed at the side ,the head should appear very high, and very, short from it’s back to the point of the nose. The forehead should be flat, neither prominent nor overhanging the face: the skin upon it and about the head very loose and well wrinkled                                               

  (3)The projections of the frontal bones should be very prominent , broad, square and high, causing a deep and wide indentation between the eyes , termed the “stop”. From the “stop” a furrow both broad and deep should extend up to the middle of the skull, being traceable to the apex.                                                                                                                                     

(4)The eyes seen from the front should be situated low down in the skull, as far from the ears as possible. The eyes and “stop” should be in the same straight line, which should be at right angles to the furrow. They should be as wide apart as possible, provided their outer corners are within the outline of the cheeks . They should be quite round in shape of moderate size, neither sunken nor prominent , and in colour should be very dark - almost, if not quite black, showing no white when looking directly forward.                                                                                                                                                   

(5)-The ears should be set high on the head- i.e. the front inner edge of each ear should (as viewed from the front) join the outline of the skull at the top corner of such outline, so as to place them as wide apart and as high and as far from the eyes as possible. In size they should be small and thin, The shape termed “rose ear” is correct and folds inwards at it’s back, the upper or front edge curving over outwards and backwards, showing part of the inside of the burr.                                                                        

(6)The face, measured from the front of the cheekbone to the nose, should be as short as possible, and it’s skin should be deeply and closely wrinkled . The muzzle should be short, broad turned upwards and very deep from the corner of the eye to the corner of the mouth. The nose should be large, broad and black it’s top should be deeply set back almost between the eyes . The distance from the inner corner of the eye (or from the centre of the “stop” between the eyes) to the extreme tip of the nose should not exceed the length from the tip of the nose to the tip of the underlip. The nostrils should be large, wide, and black with a well defined ,vertical straight line between them.                                                                                                                                                                                                        

(7)The flews ,called the “chop” should be thick, broad, pendant and very deep hanging completely over the lower jaw at the sides (not in front) They should join the under lip in front and quite cover the teeth which should not be seen when the mouth is closed             

  (8)The jaw should be broad ,massive  and square, the canine teeth or tusks ,wide apart .The  lower jaw should project considerably in front of the upper and turn up. It should be broad and square, an have the six small front teeth between the canines in an even row. The teeth should be large and strong.                                                                                                                                                                                           

(9) The neck should be moderate in length (rather short than long), very thick, deep and strong.  It should be well arched at the back , with much loose, thick and wrinkled skin about the throat, forming a dewlap on each side from the lower jaw to the chest. The chest should be very wide latterly, round, prominent, and deep, making the dog appear very broad and short legged in front                        

(10) The shoulders should be broad, sloping and deep, very powerful and muscular, and giving the appearance of having been “tacked on” to the body.                                                                                                                                                  

(11)The brisket should be capacious, round and very deep from the top of the shoulders to the lowest part where it joins the chest, and be well let down between the forelegs. It should be large in diameter and round behind the forelegs (not flat sided, the ribs being well rounded)                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

(12)The back should be short and strong, very broad at the shoulders and comparatively narrow at the loins. There should be a slight fall to the back close behind the shoulders (it’s lowest part), whence the spine should rise to the loins (the top of which should be higher than the top of the shoulders ). Thence curving again more suddenly to the tail , forming an arch- a distinctive characteristic of the breed-termed “roach back”                                                                                                                                                                                       

(13)The forelegs should be very stout and strong, set wide apart, thick , muscular and straight, with well developed forearms, presenting a rather bowed outline but the bones of the leg should be large and straight, not bandy or curved. They should be rather short in proportion to the hind legs, but not as short as to make the back appear long, or detract from the dog’s activity, and so cripple him. The elbows should be low and stand well away from the ribs The pasterns should be short , straight and strong. The forefeet should be straight, and turn very slightly outwards, of medium size and moderately round. The toes compact and thick ,being well split up ,making the knuckles prominent and high.                                                                                                                                       

(14)The hind legs should be large and muscular, and longer in proportion than the forelegs, so as to elevate the loins. The hocks should be slightly bent and well let down, so as to be long and muscular from the loins to the point of hock. The lower part of the leg should be short, straight and strong The stifles should be round and turned slightly outwards away from the body. The hocks are thereby made to approach each other and the hind feet to turn outwards. The latter , like the forefeet, should be round and compact with the toes well split up and the knuckles prominent. From its formation the dog ha a peculiar , heavy and constrained gait , appearing to walk with short , quick , steps on the tip of its toes, its hind feet not being lifted high, but appearing to skim the ground and running with the right shoulder  rather advanced ,similar to the manner of a horse in cantering.                                            

(15) The most desirable size for the bulldog is about 50 lbs. (this was later amended to 50lbs for a bitch and 55lb for a dog)                  

(16) The tail, termed the “stern” should be set on low, jut out rather straight, then turn downwards. It should be round , smooth and devoid of fringe or coarse hair. It should be moderate in length- rather short than long- thick at the root and tapering quickly to a fine point. It should have a downward carriage (not having a decided upward curve at the end), and the dog should not be able to raise it over it’s back.                                                                                                                                                                         

(17) The coat should be fine in texture, short, close and smooth (hard only from the shortness and closeness, not wiry) Its colour should be whole or smut (that is, a whole colour with a black mask or muzzle). The only colours (which should be brilliant and pure of their sort ) are whole colours, viz; brindles ,reds (with their varieties), fawns, fallows, etc., white and also pied (i.e. a combination of white with any other of the foregoing colours).  (added later was Dudley, black and black with tan are extremely undesirable colours.)

The following 100 points show the relative value of the properties mentioned in the foregoing Standard Description.

 

General  Appearance                                                                                                                                                                         10

Skull and Head   ........ size 3, Height 1, breadth and squareness 3 , shape 2,  Wrinkles 4                                                    13         

Stop  .......Depth 2, Breadth 1, Extent of furrow 1                                                                                                                           4  

Eyes........Position 2, Size 1, Shape 1, Colour 1                                                                                                                                5   

Ears......  Position 1, Size 1, Shape 1, Colour 1                                                                                                                                4  

Face........Shape and upward turn of muzzle 1,Wrinkles 1, Nose and nostril 5                                                                       10

Chop.......Breadth 1, Depth 1,   Complete covering of front teeth 1                                                                                            3

Mouth.....Width and Squareness of Jaw 2, projection and upward turn of lower jaw 2 Size and condition of teeth 2    6

Chest and Neck... ..Length 1, Thickness 1, Arch 1 Dewlap 1,Width |depth and Roundness of chest 1                                 5

Shoulders.....Size 2, Breadth 2, Muscle 1                                                                                                                                          5

Body.....Depth and thickness of brisket 2, Capacity and Roundness of ribs 3                                                                           5

Back (Roach) Shortness 2, Width of shoulders 1.Shape strength and arch at loin 2                                                               5

Forelegs..Stoutness 1 I/2 , Shortness 1, Development 1, Feet 1 1/2                                                                                            5 

Hindlegs .....Stoutness 1  , Length 1, Shape and Development 2, Feet 1                                                                                     5    

Size                                                                                                                                                                                                           5

Tail                                                                                                                                                                                                           5

Coat and |Colour                                                                                                                                                                                    5       

Total                                                                                                                                                                                                     100

The above 1875 standard was initially adopted by the Kennel Club who then "modernised" and somewhat amended it in 1987 and later, with input from The Bulldog Breed Council emphasising health requirements ,  further amendments were implemented  in 2003 .

THE KENNEL CLUB STANDARD (2003)

GENERAL APPEARANCE  -Smooth -Coated, thick set, rather low in stature, broad, powerful and compact Head` fairly large in proportion to size, but no point so much in excess of others as to destroy the general symmetry , or make the dog appear deformed or interfere with it’s powers of motion. Face short, muzzle broad, blunt and inclined upwards. Dogs showing respiratory distress highly undesirable. Body short , well knit, limbs stout, well muscled and in hard condition. Hindquarters high and strong but somewhat lighter in comparison with heavy foreparts. Bitches not so grand or well developed as dogs.                                                                                                                                        

CHARACTERISTICS- Conveys impression of determination, Strength and activity.                                                    

TEMPERAMENT-Alert, bold, loyal, dependable, courageous, Fierce in appearance but possessed of affectionate  nature.                       HEAD AND SKULL-Skull Large in circumference .Viewed from the front appears very high from corner of lower jaw to apex of skull, also very broad and square. Cheeks well rounded and extended sideways beyond eyes. Viewed from side , head appears very high and short from back to point of nose. Forehead flat with skin upon and about head, loose and finely wrinkled , neither prominent nor overhanging face. Projections of frontal bones prominent, broad, square and high ; deep, wide indentation between eyes. From stop , a furrow , both broad and deep extending to middle of skull being traceable to apex. Face from front of cheekbone to nose , short, skin wrinkled., muzzle short broad turned upwards and very deep from corner of eye to corner of mouth . Nose and nostrils large, broad and black, under no circumstances liver colour, red or brown top set back towards eyes. Distance from inner corner of eye (or from centre of stop between eyes) to extreme tip of nose not exceeding length from tip of nose to edge of under lip. Nostrils large , wide and open with defined vertical straight line between. Flews (chops) thick, broad. pendant and very deep , hanging completely over lower jaw at sides, not in front , joining under lip in front and quite covering teeth. Jaws broad, massive and square, lower jaw projecting in front of upper and turning up. Nose roll , if present, should not interfere with line of layback. Viewed from front, the various properties of the face must be equally balanced on either side of an imaginary line down centre.                                                                                                                                               

EYES-Seen from front, situated low down in skull, well away from ears. Eyes and stop in same straight line, at right angles to furrow. Wide apart, but outer corners within outline of cheeks. Round in shape, of moderate size, neither sunken nor prominent, in colour very dark- almost black-showing no white when looking directly forward. Free from obvious eye problems.                                                                                                                                                                 

  EARS-Set high- i.e. front edge of each ear ( as viewed from front) joins outline of skull at top corner of such outline, so as to place them as wide apart , as high and as far from eyes as possible small and Thin. “Rose ear” correct, i.e. folding inwards at back, upper or front inner edge curving outwards and backwards, showing part of inside of burr.                                                      

MOUTH -Jaws broad and square with six small front teeth between canines in an even row .Canines wide apart Teeth large and strong not seen when mouth closed When viewed. from front under jaw. directly under upper jaw and parallel                        

NECK -Moderate in length (rather short than long), very thick, deep and strong. Well arched at back, with much loose, thick and wrinkled skin about throat, forming dewlap on each side, from lower jaw to chest.                                           

FOREQUARTERS-Shoulders broad ,sloping and deep, very powerful and muscular giving appearance of being “tacked on “ body. Brisket capacious, round and very deep from top of  shoulders to lowest part where it joins chest. Well let down between forelegs. Large in diameter, round behind forelegs (not flat sided , ribs well-rounded , Forelegs very stout and strong, well developed, set wide apart thick muscular and straight , presenting rather bowed  outline but bones of legs large and straight not bandy nor curved and short in proportion to hind legs, but not so short as to make back appear long, or detract from dog’s activity and so cripple him. Elbows low and standing well away from ribs. Pasterns short, straight and strong.                                                        

BODY =Chest wide , latterly round , prominent and deep Back short, strong broad at shoulders comparatively narrower at loins. Slight fall to back close behind shoulders (lowest part) whence spine should rise to loins (top higher than top of shoulder) curving again more suddenly to tail forming arch (termed roach back) - a distinctive characteristic of t breed. Body well ribbed up behind with belly tucked up and not pendulous.                                                                                                 

HINDQUARTERS -Legs large and muscular, longer in proportion than forelegs, so as to elevate loins. Hocks slightly bent, well let down , legs long and muscular from loins to hock, short, straight , strong lower part. Stifles round and turned slightly outwards away from body. Hocks thereby made to approach each other and hind feet to turn outwards.                                             

FEET-Fore, straight and turning very slightly outward of medium size and moderately round.                                            

Hind, round and compact. Toes compact and thick, well split up, making knuckles prominent and high                              

TAIL-Set on low, jutting out rather straight and then turning downwards, Round smooth and  devoid of fringe or coarse hair Moderate in length - rather short than long- thick at root , tapering quickly to a fine point. Downward carriage (not having a decided upward curve at end) and never carried above back                                                                              

GAIT/MOVEMENT Peculiarly heavy and constrained appearing to walk with short ,quick steps on tips of  toes, hind feet  not lifted high, appearing to skim ground, running with one or other shoulder rather advanced.  Soundness of movement of the utmost importance.                                                                                                                                           

COAT-Fine texture, short, close, and smooth (hard only from shortness and closeness, not wiry).                                                       

COLOUR- Whole or smut (i.e. whole colour with black mask or muzzle ), Only whole colours (which should be brilliant and pure of their sort ) viz., brindles, reds with their various shades, fawns, fallows etc., white and pied (i.e. combination of white with any of the  foregoing colours ).Dudley, Black and Black with Tan highly undesirable.                                                                                     

SIZE-Dogs 25 kg  (55 lbs ) Bitches 22.7 kg ( 50 lbs.)                                                                                                                                              

FAULTS- Any departure from the foregoing points should be considered a fault and the seriousness with  which the fault should be regarded should be in exact proportion to its degree.                                                                                                                 

NOTE- Male animals should have two apparently normal testicles fully descended into the scrotum.

DOUBLE CLICK TO MAXIMISE DRAWING    

 

The Breed Council  fully approved the above but requested in early 2008 that the following be included in  literature for aspiring Judges and stated it equally applies to breeders:

u    There has been intensive public debate over several years about the health of pedigree dogs and in our case BULLDOGS. Both breeders and judges have a share in the responsibility of ENSURING that our dogs are at their peak of physical and mental health.

u    As a judge ,you can of course only have a share of this responsibility exercised when you go over the dogs presented to you. The Breed Council asks you to be very conscious of this responsibility when you judge.

u    It is a fact that highly prized dogs are used for breeding more often so it is important  to be very careful  not to give awards to dogs showing any evidence of serious defects or other faults that may affect their welfare or their descendants if used for breeding.

u    We cannot emphasize enough how you as a Judge can significantly contribute to the breeds future welfare by awarding prizes only to evidently healthy specimens  

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

On the 3rd  December 2008 The Kennel Club sent a letter  ,without warning or consultation despite ongoing dialogue with the Breed Council informing all bulldog clubs of its intention to amend the standard as follows:

Kennel Club Letter of 3rd December 2008 Proposing to change the standard.

Any proposed changes to the breed standard will appear below                                                             [Amendments Red and underlined, deletions Blue in brackets]

Bulldog

General Appearance Smooth-coated, fairly thick set, rather low in stature, broad, powerful and compact. Head, fairly large in proportion to size but no point so much in excess of others as to destroy the general symmetry, or make the dog appear deformed, or interfere with its powers of motion. Face relatively short, muzzle broad, blunt and inclined slightly upwards. Dogs showing respiratory distress highly undesirable. Body fairly short, well knit, limbs stout, well muscled and in hard condition with no tendency towards obesity. Hindquarters high and strong.  [Delete ‘but somewhat lighter in comparison with heavy foreparts’]. Bitches not so grand or well developed as dogs.

Head and Skull Skull relatively large in circumference. Viewed from front appears [delete – very] high from corner of lower jaw to apex of skull; also [Delete ‘very’] broad and square. Cheeks well rounded and extended sideways beyond eyes. Viewed from side, head appears very high and moderately short from back to point of nose. Forehead flat with skin on and about head, slightly loose and may be finely wrinkled, neither prominent nor overhanging face. [Delete ‘Projections of frontal bones prominent, broad, square and high; deep, wide indentation between eyes’]. From defined stop, a furrow [Delete ‘both broad and deep’] extending to middle of skull being traceable to apex. Face from front of cheek bone to nose, relatively short, skin may be slightly wrinkled. Muzzle short, broad, turned upwards and [Delete ‘very’] deep from corner of eye to corner of mouth. Nose and nostrils large, broad and black, under no circumstances liver colour, red or brown; [Delete ‘top set back towards eyes’]. [Delete ‘Distance from inner corner of eye (or from centre of stop between eyes) to extreme tip of nose not exceeding length from tip of nose to edge of underlip’]. Nostrils large, wide and open, with well defined vertical straight line between. Flews (chops) thick, broad, [delete ‘pendant and very’] and deep, covering [delete ‘hanging completely over’] lower jaws at sides, [delete ‘not in front’] but joining underlip in front. [Delete ‘and quite covering’] Teeth not visible. Jaws broad, strong, [delete – massive] and square, lower jaw slightly projecting in front of upper,  with moderate turn up.  [delete - and turning up]. Over nose wrinkle, if present, whole or broken, must never adversely affect or obscure eyes or nose. Pinched nostrils and heavy over nose wrinkle are unacceptable and should be heavily penalised. [Delete ‘Nose roll must not interfere with the line of layback’]. Viewed from front, the various properties of the face must be equally balanced on either side of an imaginary line down centre.

Eyes Seen from front, situated low down in skull, well away from ears. Eyes and stop in same straight line, at right angles to furrow. Wide apart, but outer corners within the outline of cheeks. Round [delete ‘in shape’], of moderate size, neither sunken nor prominent, in colour very dark – almost black – showing no white when looking directly forward. Free from obvious eye problems.

Neck Moderate in length, [Delete ‘very’] thick, deep and strong. Well arched at back, with some loose [delete ‘thick and wrinkled’] skin about throat, forming slight dewlap on each side. [Delete ‘from lower jaw to chest’].

Forequarters Shoulders broad, sloping and deep, very powerful and muscular giving appearance of being ’tacked on‘ body. Brisket [delete ‘capacious’], round and [delete ‘very’] deep [delete ‘from top of shoulders to lowest part where it joins chest’]. Well let down between forelegs. [Delete ‘Large in diameter, round behind forelegs’]. Ribs not flat-sided but well rounded). Forelegs very stout and strong, well developed, set wide apart, thick, muscular and straight, [Delete ‘presenting rather bowed outline, but’] bones of legs large and straight, not bandy nor curved and short in proportion to hindlegs, but not so short as to make back appear long, or detract from dog’s activity. [Delete ‘and so cripple him’]. Elbows low and standing well away from ribs. Pasterns short, straight and strong.

Body Chest wide, [delete ‘laterally round’] prominent and deep. Back short, strong, broad at shoulders [delete ‘comparatively narrower at loins’]. Slight fall to back close behind shoulders (lowest part) whence spine should rise to loins (top higher than top of shoulder), curving again more suddenly to tail, forming slight arch [delete ‘(termed roach back)’] – a distinctive characteristic of breed. Body well ribbed up behind with belly tucked up and not pendulous.

Hindquarters Legs large and muscular, slightly longer in proportion than forelegs, [delete ‘so as to elevate loins’]. Hocks slightly bent, well let down; legs long and muscular from loins to hock. [delete ‘short, straight, strong lower part’] Stifles [delete ‘round and’] turned very slightly outwards away from body. [Delete ‘Hocks thereby made to approach each other and hind feet to turn outwards’]

Gait/Movement
[DeletePeculiarly heavy and constrained’] Appearing to walk with short, quick steps on tips of toes, hind feet not lifted high, appearing to skim ground, running with one or other shoulder rather advanced. Soundness of movement of the utmost importance.

Characteristics, Temperament, Ears, Mouth, Feet, Tail, Coat Colour Size, Faults, Note no change.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The initial reaction from the Bulldog club members of the Breed Council was to write to the KC and reject the changes asking for a scientific reason be provided as to how these changes will improve the health of the Bulldog (this was never provided) and asking that a meeting of Breed Council delegates be held with the KC . The reply received from the Kennel Club was that was not possible as the proposed amendments would be presented to the General Committee by the 6th January 2009 for approval unless written alternatives were received from the Breed Council by the 5th January2009 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

We needed to visualise what impact these proposed changes would have on the breed and in the absence of anyone available in the UK Wes Stacey , a well known respected Bulldog breeder and International Judge  from Australia was kind enough to put us in touch with Ms Chan whose credentials are listed below and who kindly provided her graphic  interpretation with appropriate commentary.

 

Re the proposed K.C. interim standard for the Bulldog.

The purpose of this document is to outline and visually demonstrate the consequences of altering the existing  Bulldog standard. Figures1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 11 & 12 illustrate the Bulldog by the current standard. Figures 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 13 & 14 illustrate the resultant change of appearance if the interim standard were to be implemented.

Illustrations by Salina M. Chan [Artist, Animal Attendant, Animal Therapist

(Massage and laser acupuncture), British Bulldog breed association since 1960,

Registered Dog Breeder from 1980, and Group 7 Dog Judge (AUSTRALIA)].

The following outlines the proposed interim changes in brief [Amendments underlined, deletions in brackets] followed by a description of how the changes were made.

 

The  Bulldog

General Appearance

bulletsmooth-coated, fairly thick set …………Face relatively short, muzzle broad, blunt and inclined slightly upwards …………Body fairly short, well knit ……hindquarters high and strong [delete ‘but somewhat lighter in comparison with heavy foreparts’)

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

The Bulldog

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

(The  Bulldog as per the proposed KC interim standar

Head and Skull

bulletskull relatively large
bulletin profile – head appears moderately short from back to point of nose
bulletskin on and about forehead slightly loose and may be finely wrinkled
bulletflews [delete ‘pendant and very’] and deep, covering [delete ‘hanging completely over’] lower jaws and sides [delete ‘not in front’] but joining underlip in front [delete ‘and quite covering]
bulletteeth not visible
bulletjaw broad, strong [delete ‘massive’]
bulletlower jaw slightly projecting in front of upper with moderate turn up [delete ‘and turning up’]
bulletover nose wrinkle if present, whole or broken, must never adversely affect or obscure eyes or nose …………[delete ‘nose roll must not interfere with line of layback’]
bulleteyes round [delete ‘round in shape’]

To achieve the above changes I had to shorten the mandible and extend the nasal bones. The resultant skull type is closer to mesoticephalic than brachycephalic.

Neck

bulletmoderate in length, [delete ‘very’] thick, deep and strong
bulletsome loose [delete ‘thick and wrinkled’] skin about throat
bulletforming slight dewlap on each side [delete ‘from lower jaw to chest’]

By changing the skulls width and depth I have reduced the circumference of the neck and length of dewlap.

Forequarters

bulletbrisket [delete ‘capacious] round and [delete ‘very’] deep [delete ‘from top of shoulders to lowest part where it joins chest’]
bulletwell let down between forelegs [delete ‘large in diameter, round behind legs]
bulletribs not flat-sided but well rounded
bulletforelegs very stout and strong, well developed, set wide apart, thick, muscular and straight [delete ‘presenting rather bowed outline, but’] …………………….not bandy nor curved………..or detract from dog’s activity [delete ‘and so cripple him’]

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

The Bulldog

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

(The Bulldog as per proposed KC interim std.)

To reduce depth and diameter of brisket the length and shape of the ribcage had to be reduced. Doing so brought the forelegs closer together and in turn increased the angulation of scapula/humerus articulation. To prevent the forelegs from being too short the humerus needed to be lengthened.

Body

bulletchest wide [delete ‘laterally round’]
bulletback short, strong, broad at shoulders [delete ‘comparatively narrower at loins’]
bulletspine- curving again more suddenly to tail, forming slight arch [delete ‘(termed roach back)

Fig. 9

The  Bulldog

Fig. 10

(As per the proposed KC interim std.)

For the chest to be wide and not laterally round I had as previously stated reduced the diameter of the ribcage. By reducing the curve of part of the spinal column starting with the thoracic vertebrae, lumbar vertebrae, sacrum and caudal vertebrae it created the slight arch of back.

 

 Hindquarters

bulletslightly longer in proportion than forelegs [delete ‘so as to elevate loins’]
bullethocks – [delete ‘short, straight, strong lower part’] Stifles [delete ‘round and’] turned very slightly outwards away from body [delete ‘hocks, thereby made to approach each other and hind feet to turn outwards’]

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

 

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

(The  Bulldog as per proposed KC interim std.

By reducing the spinal curve we changed the angle at which the scapula meets the spinal column and caused the angle of the pelvic girdle to become steeper and this in turn produced greater angulation of the stifle joint.

Gait

bullet[delete ‘peculiarly heavy and constrained’] appearing to walk with short, quick steps on tips of toes, hind feet not lifted high, appearing to skim ground, running with one or other shoulder rather advanced. Soundness of movement of the utmost importance.

The problem with this statement is that by creating all the aforementioned changes the dogs reach and drive will have changed. No longer does he skim the ground or lead with one or other shoulder.

The proposed interim standard stated that the Characteristics, Temperament, Ears, Mouth, Feet, Tail, Coat, Colour, Size and Faults remained unchanged.

However by implementing the changes to produce Figures 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 13 & 14 some changes have occurred. Ear placement is closer together as the skull is narrower. By shortening the mandible the bite will be much closer. The tail as a continuation of the spinal column will be higher set and straighter. His size will alter, as he is not as thick set.

In conclusion,

By comparing the illustrations of the current standard and those of the proposed interim standard we can see that all the breed hallmarks which make up the Bulldog of today will be gone.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The Chairman of the Bulldog Breed Council , Robin Searle called an open  meeting  on Tuesday 30th December  to discuss a letter received from the KC stating that there was no time to meet with a delegation and unless a reply with our own alternative amendments was received prior to the 6th January the KC version of the amended standard would be submitted to  the KC General Committee for approval.

The meeting  convened  and agreed to review the proposed changes and vote on each item after discussing it. At the end a document containing the meeting's proposal was produced which is now being prepared and as I understood it , will be sent to the Kennel club with explanations and a covering letter to be presented to the General Committee. It will state that this document is the product of discussion at an open meeting called by the Chairman of the Breed Council which was attended by forty people as individual bulldoggers which included the Secretary and President of the Bulldog Club Incorporated and who voted on each amendment, in addition a letter of support was received from the Bulldog Club of Scotland and there were over 1000 signatures on a petition which backed the Breed Council decision on how to act following the meeting. This will also be sent to the committees of all clubs for ratification (probably at their forthcoming AGM's) and The KC general committee will be requested to give us more time for this to be done. Great care was taken to ensure that the conformation of the Bulldog was not changed as a result of these amendments. 

Below is the document which received the majority vote of those present .

Bulldog 2009 proposed revised standard

General Appearance Smooth-coated, fairly thick set, rather low in stature, broad, powerful and compact. Head, fairly large in proportion to size but no point so much in excess of others as to destroy the general symmetry, or make the dog appear deformed, or interfere with its powers of motion. Face short, muzzle broad, blunt and inclined upwards. Dogs showing respiratory distress highly undesirable. Body fairly short, well knit, limbs stout, well muscled and in hard condition with no tendency towards obesity. Hindquarters high and strong but somewhat lighter in comparison with heavy foreparts. Bitches not so grand or well developed as dogs.

Head and Skull Skull relatively large in circumference. Viewed from front appears high from corner of lower jaw to apex of skull; also broad and square. Cheeks well rounded and extended sideways beyond eyes. Viewed from side, head appears very high and short from back to point of nose. Forehead flat with skin on and about head, slightly loose and should be finely wrinkled, neither prominent nor overhanging face. Projections of frontal bones prominent, broad, square and high; deep, wide indentation between eyes. From defined stop, a furrow both broad and deep extending to middle of skull being traceable to apex. Face from front of cheek bone to nose, short, skin should be slightly wrinkled. Muzzle short, broad, turned upwards and very deep from corner of eye to corner of mouth. Nose and nostrils large, broad and black, under no circumstances liver colour, red or brown; top set back towards eyes. Distance from inner corner of eye (or from centre of stop between eyes) to extreme tip of nose not exceeding length from tip of nose to edge of underlip. Nostrils large, wide and open, with well defined vertical straight line between. Flews (chops) thick, broad, and deep, covering lower jaws at sides, but joining underlip in front and quite covering teeth. Jaws broad, strong and square, lower jaw projecting in front of upper and turning up. Nose roll, if present, must not interfere with the line of layback. Viewed from front, the various properties of the face must be equally balanced on either side of an imaginary line down centre.

Eyes Seen from front, situated low down in skull, well away from ears. Eyes and stop in same straight line, at right angles to furrow. Wide apart, but outer corners within the outline of cheeks. Round in shape, of moderate size, neither sunken nor prominent, in colour very dark – almost black – showing no white when looking directly forward. Free from obvious eye problems.  

Neck Moderate in length, thick, deep and strong. Well arched at back, with some loose  skin about throat, forming a dewlap on each side from lower jaw to chest.

Forequarters Shoulders broad, sloping and deep, very powerful and muscular giving appearance of being ’tacked on‘ body. Brisket capacious, round and deep from top of shoulders to lowest part where it joins the chest. Well let down between forelegs. Large in diameter, round behind forelegs (not flat-sided, ribs well rounded). Forelegs very stout and strong, well developed, set wide apart, thick, muscular and straight, bones of legs large and straight, not bandy nor curved and short in proportion to hind legs, but not so short as to make back appear long, or detract from dog’s activity. Elbows low and standing well away from ribs. Pasterns short, straight and strong.

Body Chest wide, laterally round, prominent and deep. Back short, strong, broad at shoulders, comparatively narrower at loins. Slight fall to back close behind shoulders (lowest part) whence spine should rise to loins (top higher than top of shoulder), curving again more suddenly to tail, forming an arch (termed roach back)’ – a distinctive characteristic of breed. Body well ribbed up behind with belly tucked up and not pendulous.

Hindquarters Legs large and muscular, slightly longer in proportion than forelegs, so as to elevate loins. Hocks slightly bent, well let down; legs long and muscular from loins to hock; short, straight, strong lower part. Stifles round and turned slightly outwards away from body. Hocks thereby made to approach each other and hind feet to turn slightly outwards.

Gait/Movement
Peculiarly heavy and constrained, appearing to walk with short, quick steps on tips of toes, hind feet not lifted high, appearing to skim ground, running with one or other shoulder rather advanced. Soundness of movement of the utmost importance.

Under the heading of ‘Faults’.

Pinched Nostrils, Heavy over- nose rolls and Inverted or extremely tight tails all to be heavily penalised.

Characteristics,Temperament,Ears,Mouth,Feet,Tail,Coat,Colour,Size

No change.  

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

The Breed Council subsequently received a letter from the KC stating that the General Committee had approved the interim standard but had agreed that a meeting would be arranged between the KC Standards Sub Committee and 4 delegates from the Breed Council .A sub committee was elected consisting of Mrs G.Biddle-Edwards,Mrs.V.Collins-Nattras ,Mr.C.Thomas ,Mr N.Davis Mr.R.Searle Mr P.Janes Mr A.Darmanin who then  held a sub committee meeting during which an agreement was concluded  as to which changes would be acceptable and offering suggestions to the KC. Mrs.Collins Nattras  Mr.C.Thomas Mr.N.Davis and Mr.P.Janes were elected to be the 4 delegate to meet with the Kennel Club on Tuesday the 17th March 2009.After the meeting the delegates posted the following press release:

                                                                                                                                                                                 

PRESS RELEASE

 

Four delegates from the Breed Council, Vicky Collins-Nattrass, Peter Janes MRCVS, Norman Davis and Chris Thomas, met with representatives of the Kennel Club on Tuesday 17th March to discuss the proposed changes to the Bulldog breed standard. 

The sub-committee we met consisted of Dr. Ruth Barbour (chair), Prof. Crispin, Dr. Jeff. Sampson, Mr. Frank Kane , Mr. Bill Lambert and Mrs. Meg Purnell-Carpenter.

Before the meeting convened the chairman explained that no final decision would be made at this meeting regarding changes to the standard but this meeting was to give us an opportunity to put forward our case for reinstating wording to the standard that we felt to be fundamental.

The chairman also stated that as a result of our meeting their sub-committee would be better placed to explain our point if view to ‘the powers that be’. I believe we were all a little surprised by this, as we had erroneously believed that the final decision regarding the standard would be made by the sub-committee we were meeting. We had hoped to have some indication, by the end of the meeting, what amendments to the interim standard would be acceptable, but this was not to be the case.

We proceeded with the meeting as planned and went through the standard item by item, discussing each of the changes made by the KC with a detailed explanation as to why we felt these unnecessary and how they would have no impact on the health of the bulldog.

The panel listened to our reasoning for the reinstatement of wording we felt imperative to the description of the bulldog and during the 2 ˝ hour meeting the sub-committee asked questions on all aspects of the breed, especially health.

They wanted to know in depth how many bulldogs had gone through the health scheme and, of course, Vicky had all of these facts and figures at her fingertips, (I believe it is currently around 500). The chairman congratulated the Breed Council on its work in this area and this was seconded by the other panel members. Peter dispelled some of the myths surrounding the breed and its supposed health problems and Vicky was able to give the results of our own health survey which supported Peter’s comments, which helped enormously.

Norman and I spoke on behalf of the alterations to the standard and we explained in detail why we felt it imperative that essential wording that has been removed from the standard  be reinstated.

At the end of the meeting Dr Barbour thanked us for attending and also for the packs we had supplied for each member of the sub-committee containing line drawings, copies of the standard before and after change, etc. which we hope assisted in trying to explain why bulldoggers are so passionate when it comes to our breed standard.

 

 

Chris Thomas.

Press Officer Bulldog Breed Council. 

 

 

At The Breed Council meeting it was agreed that the secretary write to the KC asking for clarification on who were the powers that be who would make a decision on the proposals from the Breed Council and when was it that a definite answer would be received. Having received no answer to the 12th June we remain in Limbo, needless to say that in the meantime winning  dogs have not changed and it is also unlikely that the public's perception of how our bulldog should look will change         

 

Shown below is a report from one of the Bulldog Breed Council delegates of the discussion with the KC which is self explanatory

Kennel Club Review of Breed Standard – Bulldog

This is the standard recently circulated to Breed Club secretaries. Although we understand that this is how the new standard will read is does of course only contain the headings where changes have taken place. The KC intend to publish the new standard in its entirety at the beginning of October.

As one of the four delegates who attended the meeting at the KC re. the changes to the standard I thought it would be beneficial to let Bulldoggers know what we had requested of the KC and the outcome. By the time we attended the KC meeting the interim standard was in place and our main objective was to focus on the changes that we felt most affected our breed. Each request to change or reinstate an item was accompanied by drawings, photos, in fact anything we felt would illustrate their importance.

In January 2009 the General Committee approved interim changes to the Breed Standard for your breed. This was part of the ongoing initiative to ensure that the Kennel Club was not encouraging exaggerations in breeds and to promote health and welfare as a prime objective for dog breeders and enthusiasts. Additionally, a new ‘Introductory’ paragraph was included on every Breed Standard, and all references within standards to the removal of dewclaws were deleted. These two elements of the Breed Standard review have not been subject to further consideration and will now be finalised.

 

During the six month consultation period the feedback from breed clubs has been carefully considered.  In the light of this, the interim changes to the Bulldog Breed Standard have been amended and finalised as follows:

General Appearance Smooth-coated, fairly thick set, rather low in stature, broad, powerful and compact. Head, fairly large in proportion to size but no point so much in excess of others as to destroy the general symmetry, or make the dog appear deformed, or interfere with its powers of motion. Face relatively ( we asked for the removal of ‘relatively’. (rejected) short, muzzle broad, blunt and inclined upwards (interim standard said ‘slightly’ upwards. They have removed slightly as requested and  added- although not excessively so. Dogs showing respiratory distress highly undesirable. Body fairly short, well knit, limbs stout, well muscled and in hard condition with no tendency towards obesity. Hindquarters high and strong. Bitches not so grand or well developed as dogs.

Head and Skull Skull relatively large in circumference. Viewed from front appears  high from corner of lower jaw to apex of skull; also broad and square. Cheeks well rounded and extended sideways beyond eyes. Viewed from side, head appears very high and moderately short from back to point of nose. Forehead flat with skin on and about head slightly loose and finely wrinkled -took out ‘may be’ slightly wrinkled, as requested, added - without excess, neither prominent nor overhanging face. Here we asked for the reinstatement of ‘Projections of frontal bones prominent, broad, square and high, deep, wide indentation between eyes.’ (rejected). From defined stop, a furrow (asked to include ‘distinct’ furrow (rejected) extending to middle of skull being traceable to apex. Face from front of cheek bone to nose, relatively short, skin may be slightly wrinkled. Muzzle short, broad, turned upwards and deep from corner of eye to corner of mouth. Nose and nostrils large, broad and black, under no circumstances liver colour, red or brown;(asked to reinstate ‘top set back towards eyes’ (rejected) Distance from inner corner of eye (or from centre of stop between eyes) to extreme tip of nose should not be less than distance from tip of the nose to edge of the underlip. Although this measurement had been removed from the interim standard we asked for it to be reinstated. The KC have altered the wording so as instead of the length given being the maximum length of the muzzle it is now the minimum with no length of muzzle limit. Nostrils large, wide and open, with well defined vertical straight line between. Flews (chops) thick, broad, and deep, covering lower jaws at sides asked to reinstate  ‘not in front’ (rejected), but joining underlip in front (asked to reinstate ‘and quite covering teeth (rejected) Replaced with. ‘Teeth not visible’. Jaws broad, strong and square, lower jaw slightly (asked for ‘slightly’ to be removed (rejected) projecting in front of upper, with moderate turn up (asked to reinstate ‘and turning up’ as ‘moderate’ not appropriate (rejected). Over nose wrinkle (asked to change wrinkle to roll (rejected), if present, whole or broken, must never adversely affect or obscure eyes or nose. Pinched nostrils and heavy over nose roll are unacceptable and should be heavily penalised. Viewed from front, the various properties of the face must be equally balanced on either side of an imaginary line down centre.

Eyes Seen from front, situated low down in skull, well away from ears. Eyes and stop in same straight line, at right angles to furrow. Wide apart, but outer corners within the outline of cheeks. Round, of moderate size, neither sunken nor prominent, in colour very dark – almost black – showing no white when looking directly forward. Free from obvious eye problems.                                      

Neck Moderate in length, thick, deep and strong. Well arched at back, with some  (asked to remove ‘some’ rejected) loose skin about throat, forming slight (asked to remove ‘slight’ rejected) dewlap on each side. Asked to reinstate ‘from lower jaw to chest’ (rejected)

Forequarters Shoulders broad, sloping and deep, very powerful and muscular giving appearance of being ’tacked on‘ body. Brisket, (asked to reinstate ‘capacious’ rejected) round and deep. Well let down between forelegs. Ribs not flat-sided but well rounded. Forelegs very stout and strong, well developed, set wide apart, thick, muscular and straight, bones of legs large and straight, not bandy nor curved and short in proportion to hindlegs, but not so short as to make back appear long, or detract from dog’s activity. Elbows low and standing well away from ribs. Pasterns short, straight and strong.                        

Body Chest wide, prominent and deep. Back short, strong, broad at shoulders (asked to reinstate ‘ comparatively narrower at loins (rejected). Slight fall to back close behind shoulders (lowest part) whence spine should rise to loins (top higher than top of shoulder), curving again more suddenly to tail, forming slight arch Asked to reinstate ‘termed roach back’ – a distinctive characteristic of the breed (rejected). Body well ribbed up behind with belly tucked up and not pendulous.                                                                                      

Hindquarters Legs large and muscular, slightly longer in proportion than forelegs. Hocks slightly bent, well let down; legs long and muscular from loins to hock. Stifles turned very slightly outwards away from body. Asked in include ‘hocks thereby made to approach each other and hind feet to turn very slightly outwards’ (rejected)         

Gait/Movement Requested ‘Controlled gait’ This term was suggested  as an alternative to ‘Peculiarly heavy and constrained’ by a member of the committee we met at the KC (it was still rejected) Appearing to walk with short, quick steps on tips of toes, hind feet not lifted high, appearing to skim ground, running with one or other shoulder rather advanced. Soundness of movement of the utmost importance.

We asked for ‘Absent, inverted or extremely tight tails to be heavily penalised’ to be added to the faults section at the end of the standard. Although applauded by the KC in several articles it was rejected.

The amendments to the standard will be effective from 1 October 2009 when they will be published in the October 2009 Kennel Gazette and on the Kennel Club website.  

We now begin to wonder if the Breed Council serves any useful purpose if its recommendations are now  ignored or rejected by the Kennel Club.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

So the modified standard which the Kennel Club  were advised would meet the Breed Council's approval (for 2009) reads as follows:

General Appearance
Smooth-coated, fairly thick set, rather low in stature, broad, powerful and compact. Head, fairly large in proportion to size but no point so much in excess of others as to destroy the general symmetry, or make the dog appear deformed, or interfere with its powers of motion. Face short, muzzle broad, blunt and inclined upwards. Dogs showing respiratory distress highly undesirable. Body fairly short, well knit, limbs stout, well muscled and in hard condition with no tendency towards obesity. Hindquarters high and strong. Bitches not so grand or well developed as dogs.

Characteristics
Conveys impression of determination, strength and activity.

Temperament
Alert, bold, loyal, dependable, courageous, fierce in appearance, but possessed of affectionate nature.

Head and Skull
Skull relatively large in circumference. Viewed from front appears high from corner of lower jaw to apex of skull; also broad and square. Cheeks well rounded and extended sideways beyond eyes. Viewed from side, head appears very high and moderately short from back to point of nose. Forehead flat with skin on and about head slightly loose and finely wrinkled, neither prominent nor overhanging face. Projections of frontal bones prominent, broad, square and high, deep ,wide indentation between .  From defined stop, a distinct furrow extending to middle of skull being traceable to apex. Face from front of cheek bone to nose, relatively short, skin may be slightly wrinkled. Muzzle short, broad, turned upwards and deep from corner of eye to corner of mouth. Nose and nostrils large, broad and black, under no circumstances liver colour, red or brown. Top set back towards eyes. Distance from inner corner of eye (or from centre of stop between eyes) to extreme tip of nose not exceeding  length from tip of the nose to edge of the underlip. Nostrils large wide and open, with well defined vertical straight line between. Flews (chops) thick, broad and deep, covering lower jaws at sides not in front. Joining underlip in front and quite covering teeth. Jaws broad, strong and square, lower jaw  projecting in front of upper and turning  up. Over nose roll, if present, whole or broken, must never adversely affect or obscure eyes or nose. Viewed from front, the various properties of the face must be equally balanced on either side of an imaginary line down centre.

Eyes
Seen from front, situated low down in skull, well away from ears. Eyes and stop in same straight line, at right angles to furrow. Wide apart, but outer corners within the outline of cheeks. Round, of moderate size, neither sunken nor prominent, in colour very dark – almost black – showing no white when looking directly forward. Free from obvious eye problems.

Ears
Set high – i.e. front edge of each ear (as viewed from front) joins outline of skull at top corner of such outline, so as to place them as wide apart, as high and as far from eyes as possible. Small and thin. ’Rose ear‘ correct, i.e. folding inwards back, upper or front inner edge curving outwards and backwards, showing part of inside of burr.

Mouth
Jaws broad and square with six small front teeth between canines in an even row. Canines wide apart. Teeth large and strong, not seen when mouth closed. When viewed from front under jaw directly under upper jaw and parallel.

Neck
Moderate in length, thick, deep and strong. Well arched at back, with loose, thick and wrinkled skin about throat, forming  dewlap on each side, from lower jaw to chest.

Forequarters
Shoulders broad, sloping and deep, very powerful and muscular giving appearance of being ’tacked on‘ body. Brisket capacious, round and deep. Well let down between forelegs. Ribs not flat-sided, but well rounded. Forelegs very stout and strong, well developed, set wide apart, thick, muscular and straight, bones of legs large and straight, not bandy nor curved and short in proportion to hindlegs, but not so short as to make back appear long, or detract from dog’s activity. Elbows low and standing well away from ribs. Pasterns short, straight and strong.

Body
Chest wide, prominent and deep. Back short, strong, broad at shoulders comparatively narrower at loins. Slight fall to back close behind shoulders (lowest part) whence spine should rise to loins (top higher than top of shoulder), curving again more suddenly to tail, forming slight arch (termed a roach back) – a distinctive characteristic of breed. Body well ribbed up behind with belly tucked up and not pendulous.

Hindquarters
Legs large and muscular, slightly longer in proportion than forelegs. Hocks slightly bent, well let down; legs long and muscular from loins to hock. Stifles turned very slightly outwards away from body. Hocks thereby made to approach each other and hind feet to turn outwards.

Feet
Fore, straight and turning very slightly outward; of medium size and moderately round. Hind, round and compact. Toes compact and thick, well split up, making knuckles prominent and high.

Tail
Set on low, jutting out rather straight and then turning downwards. Round, smooth and devoid of fringe or coarse hair. Moderate in length – rather short than long – thick at root, tapering quickly to a fine point. Downward carriage (not having a decided upward curve at end) and never carried above back

Gait/Movement
Controlled Gait Appearing to walk with short, quick steps on tips of toes, hind feet not lifted high, appearing to skim ground, running with one or other shoulder rather advanced. Soundness of movement of the utmost importance.

Coat
Fine texture, short, close and smooth (hard only from shortness and closeness, not wiry).

Colour
Whole or smut, (i.e. whole colour with black mask or muzzle). Only whole colours (which should be brilliant and pure of their sort) viz., brindles, reds with their various shades, fawns, fallows etc., white and pied (i.e. combination of white with any of the foregoing colours). Dudley , black and black with tan highly undesirable.

Size
Dogs: 25 kgs (55 lbs); bitches: 23 kgs (50 lbs).

Faults
Any departure from the foregoing points should be considered a fault and the seriousness with which the fault should be regarded should be in exact proportion to its degree and its effect upon the health and welfare of the dog. . To be heavily penalised :Pinched nostrils and heavy over nose roll  ; Absent, inverted or extremely tight tails.

Note
Male animals should have two apparently normal testicles fully descended into the scrotum.  

 

**************************************************************************************

HOT OFF THE PRESS

A letter from the KC dated the 3rd Sept 2009 was received by all club secretaries with their final version of the revised portion of the standard standard which when read in conjunction with their original letter of the 3rd December  shown above demonstrates that not only have the Kennel Club ignored any proposals (but one, changing nose wrinkle to nose roll) put forward by the Breed Council but added a new sentence which now makes a down faced bulldog the norm and an upfaced bulldog faulty. Nor have they deigned to justify in a proper scientific manner how these changes will positively impact the health of the breed. Anyone can read the new KC standard for the Bulldog on the KC website.

 

 

Below is a copy of the letter

BULLDOG HISTORY IN THE MAKING. 29.09.09
 

AT THE BULLDOG BREED COUNCIL MEETING HELD THIS MORNING ATTENDED BY 16 OF THE MEMBER CLUBS TO DISCUSS THE INTENDED PUBLICATION ON OCTOBER 1.2009 BY THE KENNEL CLUB OF ITS REVISED BULLDOG BREED STANDARD THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT WAS RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE DOG PRESS;

 

"THE BREED COUNCIL IS DISAPPOINTED WITH THE RESULT OF THE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE KENNEL CLUB REGARDING THE STANDARD. WE ARE PARTICULARLY DISAPPOINTED BY THE STATEMENT EMANATING FROM THE KENNEL CLUB THAT THE HEALTH OF THE BREED HAS DETERIORATED WHEN IN FACT THE OPPOSITE IS CLEARLY THE CASE AS EVIDENCED BY THE SUCCESS OF THE BREED IN GROUP AND BEST IN SHOW COMPETITION AND THE HUGE RISE IN POPULARITY OF THE NATIONAL BREED. CONTRARY TO THE RUMOURS, THE BREED COUNCIL WILL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE KENNEL CLUB TO PROMOTE THE HEALTH OF THE BULLDOG"

***************************************************************************************************************************

THE WEEK FOLLOWING THIS STATEMENT ROBIN SEARLE THE BREED COUNCIL CHAIRMAN RESIGNED .BELOW IS WHAT WAS PUBLISHED IN THE CANINE PRESS (THERE WERE FURTHER RESIGNATIONS FROM THE EDUCATION AND HEALTH COMMITTEES)

THE CHAIRMAN of the Bulldog Breed Council, Robin Searle, has resigned after speaking of his disappointment with both the Council and the Kennel club.  After fifteen years as Chairman, which represents eighteen Bulldog clubs, Mr Searle has spoken of his admiration of the Council, which he feels that under his leadership, ‘not just over the last twelve months but over several years, the breed council has made every effort to accommodate the demands of the breed and the Kennel Club and the concerns of the wider public.’  A great deal has been done and in his view 'the Bulldog is the healthiest it has ever been in the last 50 years or more' and, as specialist in several breeds with a wide range of conformations, his view of the Bulldog has to be taken very seriously. 

Speaking exclusively to Our Dogs Mr Searle said: ‘It is with great sadness that after 15 years as Chairman of the Bulldog Breed Council I have resigned, I am both disappointed and disheartened, both with the Kennel Club and The Breed Council.’  In March this year Council delegates, including a veterinary surgeon, met with the Kennel Club Breed Standards Committee to discuss the changes proposed to the interim standard. The delegates were of the opinion this was a good meeting, with the committee understanding and appreciating the breed points put forward. Mr Searle continued: ‘This was clearly not the case as in September we heard that all our recommendations had been rejected and that a further change was to be added - making 60 changes in all.’  The Council had planned a Judges’ Day for the end of October to explain the implications of the new standard, to which the KC were invited to send a representative. The KC replied that ‘there was nobody available at that time but they would be happy to meet with the BC on a date of the KC’s choosing.’ Suggestions

‘Since being in the Chair of the Council I have overseen the establishment of several sub-committees designed to improve the health and welfare of the breed. A Video was produced to explain to judges what they are looking for as regards the health issues associated with breed type and another for seminar organisers showing procedures and suggesting formats for mentoring and tutorials.  ‘The Council also implemented a Health Screening Scheme within which over fifty Veterinary Surgeons across the country agreed to perform a series of health checks on Bulldogs prior to them being bred from. This initiative was developed alongside a legal Puppy Contract which was created with the objective of protecting and safeguarding both buyer and breeder.  ‘The Kennel Club were made fully aware of all these efforts through the period from 2003 when the first modifications to the Standard by the Breed Council. These were all solely to do with health issues and were passed by the KC. Dr. Ruth Barbour has publicly made positive references to all these improvements that the Council has implemented.                                                                                                   

‘Now, after making the running, the Breed Council has simply accepted the KCs changes in the Standard saying although they do not agree with them or the KCs demands they will simply “have to go along with it”.                                                      

Shock                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

‘Make no mistake about it, the Bulldog is the healthiest it has ever been in the last 50 years or more and it is the Breed Council and the constituent Club's which have made this possible – not the Kennel Club. Where is the back-bone, determination, tenacity and grit that the this breed should show in defending its own?  ‘I don't know of any other National breed in any Country worldwide being attacked by their own Kennel Club in this way - why us? 

‘I believe the Kennel Club should be there to protect and promote pedigree dogs - and the National breed should not be exempt from this protection. One can only do so much for your Breed during your lifetime – I feel I have done as much as I can.’  His decision has come as a shock to all those who know him, for his dedication to dogs in general and in Bulldogs in particular is undisputed. Robin was born into a family dedicated to dogs, his grandparents showed Gundogs and his parents owned and bred Borzoi and Terriers, as well as German Shepherds. Robin himself has owned a number of breeds including Borzoi, Shetland Sheepdogs, Bulldogs, Smooth Fox Terriers, Beagles and Papillons, and more recently Great Danes and Australian Cattle Dogs. He and wife Sue, made up 29 U.K. Champions and many, many more overseas. As well as showing and breeding, he is past Chairman of the Greater London OES Club, the Borzoi Club, a branch of the Shetland Sheepdog Club and the English Toy Terrier Club. He been judging since 1959 and is passed for forty breeds and BIS, the Hound, Working, Pastoral Groups (he has already judged two of those groups at Crufts and will be judging the Pastoral Group in 2010. He has officiated extensively abroad  Bulldog breeder and exhibitor, Glynn Payne, told Our Dogs, 'I greatly regret Robin's resignation. He was highly respected among the Bulldog fraternity and he has done a great deal to promote the health of the breed. Bulldogs have improved out of all recognition in the UK over the last few years and they are getting better world wide as UK judges are demanding a healthy dog when they judge abroad.   ‘But I do understand Robin's frustration. The Kennel Club appears to be saying that the Bulldog clubs have accepted the changes the KC has made but the truth is that the clubs and the Breed Council have made it quite clear that they are very unhappy both with the changes and the Kennel Club's heavy handed treatment of them. However, they feel trapped and that they have no choice.'  

         

 

 

IN OUR OPINION THERE ALREADY EXISTS A DOG THAT FITS THE KENNEL CLUB STANDARD AS IT NOW READS AND THAT IS THE AMERICAN BULLDOG . WE HAVE NOTHING AGAINST THAT BREED BUT WANT TO KNOW WHY THE KENNEL CLUB WANTS US TO CHANGE THE (BRITISH) BULLDOG INTO THE AMERICAN ONE

 

Bulldoggers in the UK should be aware that the Kennel Club has introduced a "Breed Watch" as part of their fit for function initiative. This is to be used by judges and noted by breeders.

For Bulldogs the following is listed

"It is very important that no awards are made to exhibits that display breathing difficulties, such as shortness of breath when moving under normal conditions and noisy breathing

Points of concern for special attention by judges
bullet• Overweight
bullet• Pinched nostrils
bullet• Heavy over nose wrinkle (roll)
bullet• Eyes - excessive amounts of loose skin that impinge on the eye (e.g. from nasal folds). Conformational defects of the upper and/or lower eyelids so that the eyelid margins are not in normal contact with the eye when the dog is in its natural pose (e.g. they turn in or out, or both abnormalities are present).
bullet• Tight (screw) tail
bullet• Unsound movement

see link http://www.the-kennel-club.org.uk/services/public/breeds/watch/display.aspx?breed=Bulldog 

 
In another initiative working together with the Animal Health Trust the KC now runs DNA health screening tests.

For bulldogs the only current test is for Hyperuricosuria (HUU) full details of this scheme can be seen on the following link http://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/item/2766 it should be noted that the results of this test ie clear or carrier will also appear on the registration papers of any puppies issued from the dog/bitch tested. DNA screening is a great initiative and in our opinion health screening of this nature is a far more objective way of eliminating perceived health issues in the breed rather than tinkering and modifying breed standards. (see Hints and Tips page)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




 

 

 

 

 

 

 

setstats